Table of Contents
More than ten weeks have passed since ASC leaders gathered in Washington, D.C. for the ASCA + SAMBA Conference, but the operational priorities discussed there have only become more relevant. Outpatient volumes continue to rise, higher-acuity procedures are steadily shifting into ASCs, and quality reporting expectations continue to expand. What the conference highlighted in May has since been reinforced by CMS policy updates, payer activity, and evolving quality programs across healthcare. As ASC leaders plan for the second half of 2026, operational discipline, not volume growth alone, is becoming the defining advantage.
Recent legal challenges surrounding Medicare Advantage Star Ratings reinforce another reality: quality measurement itself is becoming more closely examined across healthcare. While the dispute centers on CMS’s methodology rather than provider performance, it highlights how reimbursement and quality programs continue to evolve. For ASC leaders, the lesson is clear. Consistent documentation and defensible reporting workflows provide stability even as quality measurement frameworks continue to change.
The Acuity Shift Is Permanent. Quality Records Start at Case One.
4,421 ASCs were evaluated for 2026 performance rankings. 911 centers earned a High Performing designation . That is up from 733 in 2025. The threshold also rose. Centers must now score in the top 15% to earn the HP rating. That was 10% last year. The bar is data-driven. It is getting harder to clear.
For 2026, U.S. News added shoulder cases to its Orthopaedics and Spine list for the first time. This reflects a real shift. Outpatient total shoulder volumes have grown four-fold in recent years. Better surgical tools and sedation made it safe. Cases that were hospital-only five years ago are now tracked and rated at ASCs. Spine fusions, cardiac cases, and complex revisions are on the same path.
The ratings use Medicare claims data from 2022 through 2024. Measures include ED visits, hospital stays, cost of errors, and post-acute care use. An ASC that starts shoulder cases today builds the record that 2028 and 2029 ratings will use. Waiting until volume ramps means losing two to three years of data. That gap affects HP status. It also affects whether payers and patients choose your center.
Quality metrics increasingly drive reimbursement, not just rankings. Documentation is what backs up the quality data behind those scores. But if the record is incomplete, the score built on it is incomplete too. Reporting accuracy matters as much as clinical accuracy: a case performed correctly but documented poorly still shows up as a gap on review. That gap is not just a compliance footnote. Incomplete documentation creates real financial risk, since payers and CMS are both reading the same record to decide what to pay. Operational workflows that keep documentation structured and consistent are what protect the quality score and the reimbursement tied to it.
CERTIFY Health’s practice management system links scheduling, intake, and coverage checks. It helps ASC teams standardize patient intake, keep records complete, and move structured clinical documentation with the case, so ASCQR quality data capture starts at the first case of any new type – not after a billing review finds a gap months later.
Quality Measurement Is Evolving Across Healthcare
Recent legal challenges involving Medicare Advantage Star Ratings have highlighted that quality measurement itself is evolving across healthcare. Courts questioned parts of CMS’s methodology for calculating 2026 Star Ratings, reinforcing that quality scoring frameworks can change even after they are implemented. While Medicare Advantage Star Ratings and ASCQR measure different aspects of quality, both reflect the broader industry movement toward stronger documentation, measurable outcomes, and defensible reporting practices.
For ASC leaders, this means documentation matters beyond compliance. Standardized intake, complete patient records, and clinical documentation structured enough to withstand audit, the same care coordination data that keeps a patient’s episode connected across pre-op, procedure, and post-discharge follow-up—create operational consistency regardless of how quality programs continue to evolve. ASCs that build these habits into daily workflow, rather than treating them as a year-end reporting exercise, stay prepared for future payer, regulatory, and reimbursement changes.
As reimbursement models continue shifting toward measurable performance, organizations with consistent documentation and reporting processes will be better positioned to adapt without disrupting revenue.
Getting Paid for New Cases Takes 6 to 10 Months After CMS Approval.
CMS added 560 codes to the ASC covered case list for 2026. That breaks down as 289 from revised criteria, 271 moved off the Inpatient-Only list, and 13 more from stakeholder requests. The new codes cover cardiac work, coronary cases, and spine fusions. These are the case types moving into ASCs right now.
CMS approval and first commercial payment are not the same event. Private payers write their own coverage rules. Those rules lag CMS by 60 to 180 days. Surgeon sign-on at a new site adds another 60 to 120 days. Add it up: the gap runs 6 to 10 months. During that time, Medicare pays. Private payer claims get denied. Not because of a clinical error. Because coverage is not yet active. Staff work appeals that cannot win yet. Finance teams ask whether the new case type even fits at the site.
The fix is not faster appeals. It is catching the gap before the case is booked. CERTIFY Health’s billing and RCM ops checks coverage at scheduling – not at billing. Surgeon status is confirmed before the first case goes on the books.
Revenue Integrity Pays Regardless of What Happens in Congress.
The case for ASCs has never been stronger. A Health study found that ASCs will cut Medicare costs by $73.4 billion from 2019 to 2028. ASCs do the same work at roughly half the cost of hospital outpatient departments. The CBO has put the savings from full site-neutral reform at $157 billion over 10 years. Policy is moving the right way. But policy does not collect revenue.
The Outpatient Surgery Access Act of 2026 was filed in March with cross-party House support. Reps. Van Duyne (R-TX) and Larson (D-CT) introduced it. It would lock in ASC pay updates at the hospital outpatient rate. It would also drop the budget cuts that hold ASC pay down. No Senate bill has been filed yet.
CMS has used the hospital market basket to set ASC rates every year since 2019. That is eight years in a row with no fix in law. The current term ends in 2026. The 2026 final rule also cut pay at off-campus hospital outpatient departments for drug admin, saving an estimated $280 million. If the Act passes, the gains add to growth. If rates drop to CPI-U, every billing gap gets worse. For an ASC taking in $1 to $5 million per month, that gap runs $60,000 to $300,000 per month. It is money on the table. Both paths favor fixing it now.
CERTIFY Health’s revenue cycle management software handles clean claim filing, denial prevention, and coverage checks. These tools cut billing gaps no matter what rates do.
Post-Conference Is the Payer Window. Act This Month.
Commercial payer contracting does not end when a conference closes. Throughout the second half of the year, ASC leaders continue preparing for contract renewals, performance reviews, and reimbursement discussions. Public quality data, operational performance, and revenue integrity remain valuable negotiation tools regardless of when those conversations occur.
Industry discussions at ASCA + SAMBA 2026 reinforced that successful payer relationships depend on continuous contract management rather than reacting only when reimbursement problems appear. High-performing ASCs consistently combine quality outcomes, operational efficiency, and financial performance to strengthen their negotiating position over time.
Public performance data continues to support those conversations. Top eye care centers averaged 40% fewer issues than the broader field, while top orthopedic centers reported 29% fewer. Financial valuation trends tell a similar story. Larger ASCs with strong operational controls and reliable revenue cycle performance continue to command higher EBITDA multiples than organizations with inconsistent documentation and billing performance.
Rather than relying on conference momentum, ASC leaders entering H2 should focus on strengthening the operational data that supports every payer discussion, quality reporting, denial performance, reimbursement trends, and consistent documentation. Those capabilities create leverage throughout the contracting cycle, not only during a specific month.
CERTIFY Health’s billing and payment tools give finance teams clear visibility into denial rates, revenue per case, payer performance, and operational trends. Combined with quality reporting data, these insights help organizations enter payer discussions with measurable performance instead of assumptions, allowing revenue cycle management software to support long-term contract strategy rather than only back-office operations.
Whether driven by evolving CMS policies, changing payer expectations, or ongoing refinement of healthcare quality programs, ASCs are operating in an environment where accurate documentation and consistent reporting matter more than ever. Leaders who strengthen these operational foundations today will be better prepared to adapt as reimbursement models and quality measurement continue to evolve.
Schedule a billing and ops review to enter H2 2026 with your systems ready, starting with the documentation and quality reporting foundations that will matter most.
